In response to my post (see "Who is driving a wedge"), Paul Griffin, or is it Paul Kuster, (hard to tell when people don't/won't use their real names) sent me this email (his words are in black, my response is in blue);
"Get your facts straight Don. We are not card carrying members of Wind Concerns Ontario. If not WCO, then which group did you join? You have posted on your web site that you and yours joined an "anti-turbine group". Either you did, or you didn't, which is it? No matter which answer you choose, you expose yourself.
Don't fault me for what you post on your web site.
Further to this, Ms Kuster (Griffin? Hesch?) posted, "You asked if we were members of an anti-wind 'organization' and I said we were not". She also posted, "That site also does NOT have strong ties to WCO or any other anti-wind group."
I believe that the above statements offer very open insights into how these people manage, or possibly mismanage the information they choose to share.
As for a wedge, it's the majority of rural Ont. and the useful idiots in urban centres as to where the wedge is. The GEA has never visited someones property in order to picket them, has never threatened anybody with a gun, has not perpetrated acts of arson, has not caused thousands of dollars in damage through acts of civil disobedience, has never shown up at a community meeting with the intent of not allowing others to speak, the list goes on. Nor has it ever posted, " YOU GO PEOPLE!" regarding acts of sabotage and vandalism.
All we're doing is pushing back against the corporate psychopaths such as yourself Ummm, I work for myself, and it's far from corporate. As for the term "psychopaths" that's just more of the standard BS from someone who finds themselves on the wrong side of history, and has run out of constructive arguments in the wind industry.
The studies you cite are only in contrast to the so-called 17 studies the pro-wind side produced and was systematically debunked and destroyed.
I didn't realize the the Mass Gov (health), Australian EPA (infra sound), Lawrence Berkley National Labs (property values), etc are considered pro-wind organizations?
Can't blame us trying to at least level the playing field. Level the playing field is one thing, promoting hatred through the use of misinformation and outright lies is another. After all, lying is what this was all about in the first place.
Unlike your rhetoric , I can offer far more factual arguments Please do Mr Griffin. But please, no more useless information produced by other members of your group. It's more then a little biased, and normally based on junk science and supported solely by other members.
will hopefully spare your children and mine the oppressive bill still to come. My children are good, thank you very much. Thanks for the (wind)concern, but I'll pass.
And so that everything is transparent, I own a company called Sun Wind Benefits. We manufacture small scale wind and water energy systems for rural and remote properties. We also offer our products to people and families that wish to remove part of their load from the grid.
At no time have I ever worked for the big wind companies, nor have I been involved in the Ontario MicroFIT program.
I am a supporting member of Friends of Wind Ontario. In fact I ask everybody who's starting to view this "anti" rhetoric as a circus side show, to log onto http://friendsofwind.ca/ and sign up.
Paul, in the interest of transparency, who do you work for? Power Workers Union perhaps? Bruce Nuclear? And please, no more lying, you know the truth will come out.
No comments:
Post a Comment